Skip to main content

Johnson v. O'Malley Bros. Corp.

Citations

  • 285 Or. App. 804
  • 397 P.3d 554
  • 2017 WL 2376519
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the party seek- ing to rely on a statutory exception has the burden of per- suasion and production on its applicability
  • party seeking to rely on a statutory exception bears \the burden of proving its application\
  • “[L]egal determinations with respect to entitlement to attorney fees [are reviewed] for errors of law.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • “[L]egal determinations with respect to entitlement to attorney fees [are reviewed] for errors of law.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • “As the party seeking to rely on the statutory exception under ORS 652.200(2), defendant [bears] the burden of proving its application.”
  • “[D]iscre- tionary decisions, such as whether to award attorney fees that are not mandatory * * * are subject—not surprisingly— to review for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dehoog, Sercombe, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.