Johnson v. Ohio Dept. of Taxation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reasonable foreseeability does not “require that litigation be ‘imminent, or probable without significant contingencies’” (citation omitted)
• holding a party must have “intended to impair the 9 ability” of a litigant to put on a case or defend itself to find “bad faith” (quoting Schmid, 13 F.3d at 80)
• noting that information may not be in the party’s control or that information the party has preserved may be destroyed by events outside the party’s control
• holding a party must have \intended to impair the ability\ of a litigant to put on a case or defend itself to find \bad faith\ (quoting Schmid , 13 F.3d at 80 )
• stating that “courts have the inherent power to control litigation by im- posing sanctions appropriate to rectify improper conduct by litigants” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• stating that the standard for whether a duty to preserve existed is reasonableness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).