Skip to main content
· 9/18/1939

Johnson v. Mooremack Gulf Lines

Citations

  • 30 F. Supp. 259
  • 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2002

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The court believes that [sur-reply] papers should be viewed as the exception and not the rule.”
  • even reply briefs should not be used unless the reply addresses new issues raised in the respondent’s pleading in opposition or unless a request is specifically made by the court.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kalodner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.