Johnson v. McFry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a motion for reconsideration “should not be based on evidence that was readily available at the time the motion was heai-d”
• “Motions for reconsideration are not a vehicle for parties to present arguments that they should have made during the regular briefing.”
• “[A] motion for reconsideration ... should not be based on evidence that was readily available at the time the motion was heard.” (citations omitted)
• “[A] motion for reconsideration . . . should not be based on evidence that was readily available at the time the motion was heard”
• “[A] motion for reconsideration ... should not be based on evidence that was readily available at the time the motion was heard.”
• “[A] motion for reconsideration . . . should not be based on evidence that was readily available at the time the motion was heard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).