Johnson v. Mayo Yarns, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the need for finality following trial dictates that “litigation must come to an end some time”
• denying Rule 59 motion for reconsideration of entry of judgment dismissing complaint
• “It is well-settled that Rule 59 is not a vehicle for relitigating old issues, presenting the case under new theories, securing a rehearing on the merits, or otherwise taking a ‘second bite at the apple[.]’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).