Skip to main content
· 1/10/1968

Johnson v. Mattox

Citations

  • 257 Cal. App. 2d 714
  • 65 Cal. Rptr. 185
  • 1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 2498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • precluding recovery for construction work but permitting recovery for the sale 22 of a tractor and mowers because “[t]here is no building or construction activity involved 23 in the furnishing of a tractor and mowers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salsman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.