Johnson v. Maryland State Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the Tort Claims Act’s administrative claim requirement is not a statute of limitations” but rather “a condition precedent to the initiation of an action under the -Act”
• finding that \the Tort Claims Act's administrative claim requirement is not a statute of limitations\ but rather \a condition precedent to the initiation of an action under the Act\
• noting a “majority of courts ... have held that notice of claim requirements under the Tort Claims Acts do not violate equal protection principles” and compiling cases
• noting a “majority of courts . . . have held that notice of claim requirements under the Tort Claims Acts do not violate equal protection principles” and compiling cases
• concerning common law remedy for negligence arising out of an automobile accident
• a “ ‘restriction upon access to the courts violates Article 19 only if the restriction is unreasonable’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).