Johnson v. March

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a Rule 91a motion to dismiss that challenged the trial court’s subject-matter jurisdiction challenged only the pleadings, especially considering Rule 91a.6 bars the consideration of evidence in ruling on the Rule 91a motion to dismiss
• noting municipality’s assertion in Rule 91a motion that governmental immunity deprived trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction over claims and concluding that court’s denial of motion asserting such immunity could be challenged by interlocutory appeal
• “To be entitled to an interlocutory appeal, section 51.014(a)(8

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).