Skip to main content
· 11/12/2002

Johnson v. Maddox

Citations

  • 230 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21780
  • 2002 WL 31520187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that copyright registration by a non-owner had no legal effect, and was legally insufficient to support a copyright infringement action
  • “KPMG Singapore did not prepare, draft, edit or provide numbers for the audit. Its role was more akin to the ‘review and approval’ allegations which no court has found sufficient to trigger liability after Central Bank.”
  • noting the universal rejection of “review and approval” allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.