Johnson v. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding unjust enrichment appropriate even where defendant was not a wrongdoer and had “no intent to deprive” the plaintiff of his benefit
• finding unjust enrichment appropriate even where defendant was not a wrongdoer and had “no intent to deprive” the plaintiff of his benefit
• distinguishing the measure of damages for unjust enrichment and quantum meruit
• “Unjust enrichment ... allows an award of restitution for the value of the benefit unjustly received, rather than the value of the services provided.”
• “Unjust enrichment . . . allows an award of restitution for the value of the benefit unjustly received, rather than the value of the services provided.”
• “[T]he equitable remedy of unjust enrichment is unwarranted when the rights of the parties are controlled by an express contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).