Skip to main content

Johnson v. King

Citations

  • 371 N.E.2d 18
  • 55 Ill. App. 3d 336
  • 13 Ill. Dec. 323
  • 1977 Ill. App. LEXIS 3816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e believe that the classification created by [the notice statute] is reasonable and has not infringed plaintiffs’ right to due process and equal protection of the law”
  • \[W]e believe that the classification created by [the notice statute] is reasonable and has not infringed plaintiffs' right to due process and equal protection of the law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.