North Dakota Supreme Court· 9/14/2000
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 2000 ND 170
- 617 N.W.2d 97
- 2000 N.D. LEXIS 178
- 2000 WL 1337006
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that adoption was unknown at common law and that the rights and liabilities emanating from adoption are governed by descent, distribution, and adoption statutes
- stating that the doctrine of equitable adoption “is not intended to create the legal relationship of parent and child, with all its attendant consequences, and does not effect a legal adoption”
- “The doctrine of equitable adoption, despite its name, bears almost no relationship to a statutory legal adoption.”
- “The doctrine of equitable adoption, despite its name, bears almost no relationship to a statutory legal adoption.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maring, Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Neumann, Kapsner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reutter Ex Rel. Reutter v. BarnhartEighth Circuit· 2004-06-16· cited 128×
- WFND, LLC v. Fargo Marc, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-05-07· cited 85×
- Sommer v. SommerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-05· cited 56×
- In re Estate of William J. HannifinUtah Supreme Court· 2013-08-02· cited 56×
- Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-07-10· cited 55×
- Heinz v. HeinzNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 38×
- Reutter v. BarnhartEighth Circuit· 2004-06-16· cited 23×
- Berg v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-04-18· cited 17×
- Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-09-20· cited 16×
- Poncho v. BowdoinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-12-07· cited 15×
- Combs v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-01-15· cited 14×
- Silbernagel v. SilbernagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-07-13· cited 14×
- In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-07-15· cited 12×
- Great Plains Royalty Corp. v. Earl Schwartz Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-04-05· cited 12×
- Northrop v. NorthropNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-02-15· cited 11×
- Thompson v. SchmitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-10-16· cited 6×
- Sanders v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-03-16· cited 3×
- State v. EnnenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-07-13· cited 2×
- Reutter Ex Rel. Reutter v. BarnhartD. North Dakota· 2003-04-04· cited 2×
- Sanders v. Riley, AdministratorSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-03-16
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-07-19· cited 157×
- Stout v. StoutNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-04-01· cited 120×
- Van v. ZahorikMichigan Supreme Court· 1999-07-07· cited 100×
- Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-25· cited 91×
- Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-10-30· cited 89×
- Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-03· cited 84×
- Bullock v. BullockNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-08-13· cited 74×
- Matter of Adoption of KASNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-04-27· cited 70×
- Fox v. FoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-04-12· cited 63×
- Fuller v. FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1968-11-12· cited 60×
- Moilan v. MoilanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-06-18· cited 59×
- Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-24· cited 57×
- Riehl v. RiehlNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-06-18· cited 56×
- In Re Marriage of ValleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-12-19· cited 51×
- Amann v. FrederickNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-08-18· cited 46×
- Marriage of Fenn v. FennCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-02-11· cited 45×
- Sargeant v. SargeantNevada Supreme Court· 1972-04-07· cited 43×
- Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-11-09· cited 43×
- Mellum v. MellumNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-03-21· cited 40×
- Fisher v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-04-23· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.