Tenth Circuit· 10/31/2006

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

466 F.3d 1213
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27000
2006 WL 3072771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

a district court has discretion to request an attorney to represent a litigant who is proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)
“[A]s a civil litigant, [defendant] has no Sixth Amendment right to counsel.”
a district court has discretion to to appoint counsel under § 1915(e)(1), the district court may consider a variety of factors, including: (1) the merits of the litigant’s claims, (2) the nature of the factual issues raised in the claims, (3
a district court has discretion to request district court may consider a variety of factors, including: (1) the merits of the litigant’s claims, (2) the nature of the factual issues raised in the claims, (3) the litigant’s ability to present his/her claims, and (4
affirming ruling that went unchallenged on appeal
affirming district court’s unchallenged rulings without discussion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Henry, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.