Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 5/23/1939
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 303 Mass. 204
- 21 N.E.2d 224
- 1939 Mass. LEXIS 923
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The statutes upon which the present bill is based furnish a convenient and expeditious method by which creditors may satisfy their claims but they do not create claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harrington v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1944-05-04· cited 51×
- Chandler v. DunlopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-02-24· cited 49×
- Putnam Furniture Building, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1948-07-06· cited 19×
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. SweeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1941-04-17· cited 18×
- Zwick v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1939-09-16· cited 17×
- Detore v. Demers Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-12-21· cited 7×
- Richard F. Burkhart v. Genworth Financial, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2022-05-10
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Paraboschi v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1927-03-03· cited 58×
- E. S. Parks Shellac Co. v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1928-11-26· cited 55×
- Luster v. LusterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1938-02-28· cited 47×
- Gallo v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1937-12-02· cited 35×
- Lubowitz v. TainesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-12-30· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.