Washington Supreme Court· 1/22/1910
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 57 Wash. 89
- 106 P. 500
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 700
Syllabus
<p>Marriage — Validity — First Cousins — Statutes — Extraterritorial Force. A marriage between first cousins domiciled in Seattle, contracted in Victoria, B. C., where they went to evade the law of this state prohibiting such marriages, the parties immediately returning to their domicile, is void, and it is error to refuse a decree of divorce therefrom.</p>
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 139×
- Catalano v. CatalanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-04-20· cited 21×
- Pierce v. PierceWashington Supreme Court· 1910-06-03· cited 12×
- In Re the Estate of LoughmillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1981-06-10· cited 11×
- State v. NakashimaWashington Supreme Court· 1911-04-05· cited 8×
- Estate of PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-06-15· cited 7×
- Incuria v. IncuriaNew York Family Court· 1935-06-08· cited 4×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.