Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 16

Syllabus

The trial court erred in failing to address Husband's retirement benefits in its distribution of marital property. Because the issue of spousal support can be determined only after an equitable division of marital property, R.C. 3105.171(C)(3), the court's distribution of the retirement account on remand will necessarily require it to reconsider the issue of spousal support. The trial court's order making Husband responsible for \all outstanding bills associated with the prior marital residence\ did not set forth with sufficient specificity what he was required to pay. Judgment reversed and remanded. (Tucker, P.J., concurring.)