South Dakota Supreme Court· 5/29/1991
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 471 N.W.2d 156
- 1991 S.D. LEXIS 88
- 1991 WL 89626
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that if a “husband fraudulently dissipated marital assets, they should be included in the marital estate and charged against him”
- stating that “[t]he trier of fact is free to accept all of, part of, or none of the expert’s opinion.”
- introducing evidence of no income and extensive counseling needed to be employable
- “If the trial court finds, based on the evidence presented at the original trial, that husband fraudulently dissipated marital assets, they should be included in the marital estate and charged against him.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amundson, Miller, Wuest, Henderson, Sabers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-08-14· cited 65×
- Grode v. GrodeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 64×
- Kanta v. KantaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-12-31· cited 46×
- Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-03-09· cited 41×
- Christians v. ChristiansSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-05· cited 37×
- Kost v. KostSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-04-20· cited 36×
- DeVries v. DeVriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-07-06· cited 34×
- Endres v. EndresSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-05-17· cited 33×
- Voelker v. VoelkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-08-24· cited 32×
- Evans v. EvansSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 31×
- Hill v. HillSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-03-18· cited 30×
- Pellegrin v. PellegrinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-02-25· cited 29×
- Midzak v. MidzakSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-05-11· cited 29×
- Saxvik v. SaxvikSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-02-28· cited 26×
- Vander Pol v. Vander PolSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-04-29· cited 26×
- Terca v. TercaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-10-22· cited 24×
- Kappenmann v. KappenmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 23×
- Abrams v. AbramsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-05-25· cited 22×
- Priebe v. PriebeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-12-04· cited 21×
- Bennett v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-05-25· cited 17×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-04-03· cited 197×
- Lien v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-04-19· cited 146×
- Saint-Pierre v. Saint-PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-10-03· cited 94×
- Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-04-20· cited 81×
- Hautala v. HautalaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-01-06· cited 67×
- Garnos v. GarnosSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-11-06· cited 65×
- Nelson v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-04-11· cited 65×
- Fox v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-03-27· cited 61×
- Baltzer v. BaltzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-04-13· cited 52×
- Studt v. StudtSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-07-05· cited 50×
- Jasper v. JasperSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 45×
- Cooper v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-12-17· cited 39×
- Ryken v. RykenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-09-12· cited 38×
- Ryken v. RykenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-04-26· cited 36×
- Stubbe v. StubbeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-11-20· cited 35×
- Herrboldt v. HerrboldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-03-11· cited 35×
- Balvin v. BalvinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-02-11· cited 35×
- Bradeen v. BradeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 34×
- Matter of Estate of DonahueSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 31×
- Nauman v. NaumanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-06-09· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.