Skip to main content

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

  • 307 N.W.2d 783
  • 209 Neb. 317
  • 1981 Neb. LEXIS 917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “the speculative nature of the expected return on” prepaid farm planting expenditures prevented those expenditures from being an asset divisible on divorce
  • trial court may provide that allowance payable in installments will not draw interest until payments are due

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krivosha, McCown, Brodkey, Hastings, Hickman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.