Johnson v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Pennsylvania law creates a rebuttable presumption that property held by a husband and wife is held in tenancy by the entireties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Kenneth E. Brannon, Kathy Fick Sippola, in 05-4600. In Re Thomas Michael Lewis, Debtors. Thomas Michael Lewis Sherry Michelle Lewis, in 05-5060
  Third Circuit· 2007-02-07· cited 40×
• Hill v. Department of Corrections
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-10· cited 35×
• Com. v. Caviness, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-11-23· cited 16×
• Jones, B. v. McGreevy, D.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-01-11· cited 16×
• Dovin, J. v. Honey Brook Golf Club
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-10-28· cited 9×
• Kulp v. Kulp
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-03-12· cited 7×
• Weber v. Weber
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-08-11· cited 5×
• In Re: Estate of Navarra Appeal of: Navarra, R.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-04-06· cited 4×
• Plastipak Packaging, Inc. v. DePasquale
  Third Circuit· 2010-01-27· cited 2×
• In Re: Brannon
  Third Circuit· 2007-02-07
• Weber, B. v. Weber, M. v. Weber, M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-08-11
• MA-SA Construction, LLC v. Tropp, B.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-07-17