Skip to main content

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

  • 580 A.2d 503
  • 155 Vt. 36
  • 1990 Vt. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing difficulty of predicting when spouse would be self-supporting and noting that disadvantaged party can seek modification if maintenance period proves too short or too long
  • affirming $1500 award for sixteen year marriage where wife could earn $17,000 annually
  • affirming $1500 award for sixteen year marriage where wife could earn $17,000 annually
  • party appealing maintenance decision must show that there is no reasonable basis to support it
  • party appealing maintenance decision must show that there is no reasonable basis to support it
  • if period for alimony payments “proves too short or too long, the disadvantaged party can seek modification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Peck, Gibson, Dooley, Morse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.