New Mexico Supreme Court· 10/26/1964
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 396 P.2d 181
- 74 N.M. 567
- 1964 NMSC 233
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a motion for leave to appeal was effective as a notice of appeal
- holding that a motion for leave to appeal was effective as a notice of appeal
- denomination of notice of appeal not jurisdictional; what is important is that the document substantially complied with and gave information required by rule governing timely filing of notice of appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moise, Compton, Carmody, Chavez, Noble
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Trujillo v. SerranoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-03-08· cited 139×
- Roberson v. Board of Education of City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-07-24· cited 29×
- Wakeland v. New Mexico Dep't of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-09-27· cited 28×
- Montgomery v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-04-18· cited 25×
- Perschbacher v. MoseleyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1965-06-28· cited 23×
- Mabrey v. Mobil Oil CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-03-31· cited 22×
- Krebs v. KrebsIdaho Court of Appeals· 1988-07-07· cited 14×
- Weiss v. Hanes Manufacturing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-07-19· cited 13×
- Martinez v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 12×
- Santa Fe National Bank v. GaltNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-11-15· cited 5×
- Johnson v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-02-03· cited 5×
- Wakeland v. New Mexico Department of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-01-19· cited 5×
- Matter of Estate of BergmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-06-30· cited 4×
- State v. NavasNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-09-11· cited 3×
- Griego v. RoybalNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1970-02-16· cited 3×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crump v. HillFifth Circuit· 1939-05-24· cited 41×
- Adams v. TatschNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-06-28· cited 35×
- Reed v. Fish Engineering CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-03-02· cited 24×
- Wiseman v. N. P. R. R.Oregon Supreme Court· 1891-03-31· cited 19×
- Chesher v. Shafter Lake Clay Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1941-07-08· cited 18×
- Keil v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1942-11-10· cited 18×
- Kaye v. Cooper Grocery CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1957-06-10· cited 14×
- Barelas Community Ditch Corp. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1956-05-31· cited 8×
- Woodson v. LeeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 8×
- Cross v. RitchNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1956-05-09· cited 6×
- Johnson v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-02-03· cited 5×
- Hedrick v. JaggerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1942-09-18· cited 4×
- Daly v. BernsteinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1892-01-06· cited 3×
- Williams v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1956-07-25· cited 2×
- Andrew & Sierau v. KeenanSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1859-07-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.