Johnson v. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, “[s]ince the change of zone, as we have previously indicated, is in harmony with the comprehensive plan, it cannot be classified as spot zoning”
• board members must be sufficiently acquainted with issues raised and arguments presented at public hearing “in order to exercise an informed judgment”
• “Since the change of zone, as we have previously indicated, is in harmony with the comprehensive plan, it cannot be classified as spot zoning.”
• plaintiffs admitted no evidence and therefore failed to sustain burden of showing that commissioner did not familiarize himself with the issues of the appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).