Johnson v. Hulett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \A bare mention of ineffective assistance is not sufficient to avoid a procedural default ....\
• “A bare mention of ineffective assistance is not sufficient to avoid a procedural default … .
• “[Petitioner] cannot argue one theory to the state courts and another theory, based on different facts, to the federal court.” (citation omitted)
• “[Petitioner] cannot argue one theory to the state courts and another theory, based on different facts, to the federal court.”
• claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to call a particular witness was defaulted even though the 18 petitioner had argued that counsel was ineffective for failing to call other witnesses
• “A bare mention of ineffective assistance of counsel is not sufficient to avoid a procedural default; [the petitioner] must have ‘identif[ied] the specific acts or omissions of counsel that form the basis for [his] claim of ineffective assistance.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).