Johnson v. Hui

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting Rule 17 23.1 requirements are not “merely a technical pleading hurdle,” but rather “based on a 18 fundamental tenet of American corporate law that places the responsibility for making decisions in 19 the hands of the board of directors”
• “Rule 23.1 thus codifies the long-standing requirement 24 that a plaintiff who pursues the extraordinary remedy of a derivative suit make demand upon [the] 25 corporation’s directors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).