Skip to main content
· 5/1/2012

Johnson v. Hobbs

Citations

  • 678 F.3d 607
  • 2012 WL 1499916
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Typically, a petitioner’s pro se status and failure to follow rules for filing state post-conviction petitions do not constitute extraordinary circumstances.”
  • “Typically, a petitioner's pro se status and failure to follow rules for filing state post-conviction petitions do not constitute extraordinary circumstances.”
  • “A petition to review a decision of the court of appeals ‘must be filed within 18 calendar days from the date of the decision . . . .’”
  • “Typically, a 3 In Streu v. Dormire, 557 F.3d 960, 966 (8th Cir. 2009), the Eighth Circuit reaffirmed the holding in Williams v. Bruton, 299 F.3d 981 (8th Cir. 2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Loken, and Gruender, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.