Skip to main content
· 7/1/2011

Johnson v. HIX WRECKER SERVICE, INC.

Citations

  • 651 F.3d 658
  • 17 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1623
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13618
  • 2011 WL 2586284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A party opposing summary judgment does not have to rebut factual propositions on which the movant bears the burden of proof and that the movant has not properly supported in the first instance.”
  • “A party opposing summary judgment does not have to rebut factual propositions on which the movant bears the burden of proof and that the movant has not properly supported in the first instance.”
  • “A party opposing summary judgment does not have to rebut factual propositions on which the movant bears the burden of proof and that the movant has not properly supported in the first instance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Williams, Pallmeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.