Johnson v. Hinds County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a chancery court “has the power and authority to enjoin parties for violations of zoning ordinances”
• finding a county had standing as an “interested party” under Rule 57 when a 5 real estate developer argued it was intruding into private contracts between the developer and individual lot owners
• mandatory injunction to enforce compliance with subdivision rules survives death of developer since developer’s “personal representatives must be as accountable as was he, no more and no less”
• “Claims regarding title, possession and use of land are well within the chancery court subject matter jurisdiction.”
• failure of enforcement in the past does not render a statute inoperative
• admonishing parties for relying on pre-rules doctrine of \necessary parties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).