Skip to main content
· 9/15/1970

Johnson v. Hertz Corp.

Citations

  • 316 F. Supp. 961
  • 2 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 980
  • 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10246
  • 3 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Given the identification of the remaining defendants only as ‘John Doe,’ there is no method of serving the complaint in accord with due process, and no way that the action can otherwise proceed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.