Skip to main content
· 6/30/1976

Johnson v. Heintz

Citations

  • 243 N.W.2d 815
  • 73 Wis. 2d 286
  • 1976 Wisc. LEXIS 1142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \To allow the admission of details including the amount of settlement as an exception to the rule would defeat the purpose of the rule and render it meaningless.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.