Skip to main content
· 3/17/1905

Johnson v. Hartman

Citations

  • 119 Ill. App. 206
  • 1905 Ill. App. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a county supervisor owed a duty “for the benefit of the public” but owed no duty to the individual plaintiff
  • concluding a county supervisor owed a duty “for the benefit of the public” but owed no duty to the individual plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Creighton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.