Johnson v. Hardin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court’s remarks about the time, effort, and money for a retrial were coercive and violated Kersey
• noting that the Rules of Appellate Procedure are flexible and may be suspended in a particular case for good cause
• involving portions .of a transcript attached to a motion for new trial in the technical record but not properly filed and certified as a transcript
• addressing the merits of the case despite appellant’s failure to explain how the trial court erred, “particularly in light of [the appellant’s] pro se status, the abbreviated record, and the clarity of the issue presented.”
• addressing the merits of the case despite the appellant’s failure to explain how the trial court erred, “particularly in light of [the appellant’s] pro se status, the abbreviated record, and the clarity of the issue presented”
• “A hung jury is a legitimate end of a criminal trial.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).