Skip to main content
· 2/24/1975

Johnson v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Citations

  • 228 N.W.2d 795
  • 58 Mich. App. 708
  • 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “if plaintiff seeks to introduce th[e] report only to show [defendant’s] notice and knowledge of the [premises’] dangerous condition, there is no hearsay problem and it should be admitted.”
  • holding that “if plaintiff seeks to introduce th[e] report only to show [defendant’s] notice and knowledge of the [premises’] dangerous condition, there is no hearsay problem and it should be admitted.”
  • train traveling at an excessive speed was not the proximate cause of an accident where the vehicle crossed when the train was only fifty feet away and the accident would not have been avoided had the train been traveling at a non-negligent speed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillis, Brennan, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.