Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• questioning the rationale of Alvarez, but reversing on other grounds and “leav[ing] resolution of these important issues to another day”
• applying California’s primary rights doctrine to determine preclusive effect of federal court decisions
• “Although [the prior judgments] are decisions by a federal court, because the district 11 court was exercising diversity jurisdiction, California law determines their preclusive effect.”
• a 7 court may refer to the entire record to determine issues decided 8 in earlier case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-04-26· cited 117×
• Ivanoff v. Bank of America, N.A.
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-03-13· cited 103×
• Mullins v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2009-09-30· cited 87×
• Association of Irritated Residents v. Department of Conservation
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-05-04· cited 66×
• YKA Industries, Inc. v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San Jose
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-04-28· cited 59×
• Cohen v. DirecTV, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-09-28· cited 51×
• Ideal v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LP
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-04-27· cited 32×
• Martinez v. Joe's Crab Shack Holdings
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-11-10· cited 31×
• Bridgeford v. Pacific Health Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-01-18· cited 31×
• Lopez v. Friant & Assocs., LLC
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-09-26· cited 30×
• Samara v. Matar
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-02-15· cited 14×
• Thee Aguila, Inc. v. Century Law Grp., LLP
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-07-02· cited 13×
• Cheveldave v. Tri Palms Unified Owners Ass'n
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-10-03· cited 12×
• Riley v. Giguiere
  E.D. California· 2009-06-19· cited 4×
• Southern California Stroke Rehabilitation Associates, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.
  S.D. California· 2011-03-24· cited 3×
• In Re Fedex Ground Pckg. Sys., Inc., Emp. Practices Lit.
  N.D. Indiana· 2010-04-21· cited 1×
• Martinez v. Joe's Crab Shack Holdings
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-12-03
• Marriage of Parker
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-08-22
• Lopez v. Friant & Assoc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-09-26
• In re M.A.
  California Court of Appeal· 2018-02-26