Johnson v. Georgia Department of Human Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a corporate child-care facility and its employee did not fall within the statutory definition of an “employee” under the GTCA
• holding that a corporate child-care facility and its employee did not fall within the statutory definition of an “employee” under the GTCA
• finding foster care organization is not foster parent and thus not a state employee under GTCA
• the “GTCA’s statutory definition of employee . . . excludes corporations and independent contractors doing business with the State”
• the \GTCA's statutory definition of employee ... excludes corporations and independent contractors doing business with the State\
• “The Georgia General Assembly has spoken by removing from the pool of State employees covered by the [GTCA] independent contractors. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).