Johnson v. Gene's Supermarket, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Delaware authority in concluding that advancement and indemnification are separate rights, and that a right to advancement, unlike a right to indemnification, is not preconditioned on a finding that the person seeking advancement has met a particular standard of conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vukusich v. Comprehensive Accounting Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-12-11· cited 23×
• Eagle Books, Inc. v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-01-30· cited 18×
• FIDELITY FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N v. Felicetti
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-08-04· cited 1×
• Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Felicetti
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-08-04· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Biehn v. Tess
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1950-04-03· cited 32×
• Sports Unlimited, Inc. v. Scotch & Sirloin of Woodfield, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-03-22· cited 20×
• Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Aircall Communications, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-11-19· cited 15×
• Goldblatt Bros. v. Sixty-Third & Halsted Realty Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1949-09-30· cited 14×
• Curran v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1952-11-25· cited 8×
• Lums Restaurant Corp. v. Bloomington Restaurant Investments, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-02-03· cited 5×