Johnson v. Fla. Unemp. Appeals Com'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a single negligent failure to ring up a sale cannot support a finding that the employee was guilty of misconduct....”
• holding that use of offensive language was not misconduct where it was an isolated incident, was in a private office, and was neither a personal attack on the supervisor nor calculated to undermine his authority
• reversing denial of benefits based upon misconduct where claimant used profanity during conversation in private office with supervisor
• employee not disqualified from benefits for using vulgarity because language was not part of a pattern of behavior and did not occur in presence of others
• employee was not disqualified from unemployment benefits for using vulgar language where such language was not part of a pattern of behavior and did not occur in the presence of others
• employee was not disqualified from unemployment benefits for using vulgar language where such language was not part of a pattern of behavior and did not occur in the presence of others

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).