Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 11/2/2011

Johnson v. Fink (In Re Johnson)

Citations

  • 458 B.R. 745
  • 2011 WL 5175605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that right to modify has been interpreted by some courts as limited to substantial change in circumstances
  • finding that debtors were bound to confirmed plan that included Social Security income regardless of recent case law, unless there was a correlated change in circumstances allowing modification
  • requiring a substantial change in circumstances and a modification of the plan that correlates to the change
  • requiring a substantial change in circumstances and a modification of the plan that correlates to the change
  • requiring a substantial change in circumstances and a modification of the plan that correlates to the change
  • requiring a substantial change in circumstances and a modification of the plan that correlates to the change

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kressel, Saladino, Nail

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Johnson v. Fink (In Re Johnson)

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.