Johnson v. Feder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the holding of McShay v. State, 447 So.2d 444 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
• “We are compelled by well-established norms of statutory construction to choose that interpretation of statutes and rules which renders their provisions meaningful.”
• “Statutory interpretations that render statutory provisions superfluous are, and should be, disfavored.” (internal 12 quotation marks omitted)
• courts are not to presume that a given statute employs useless language
• not to be presumed that a statute contains useless language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).