Johnson v. Farmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[t]he exclusive remedy provisions ... serve to preclude the loss-of-consprtium claims”
• finding husband’s claim for loss of consortium against his wife’s employer was precluded because his wife’s claim was barred by the exclusive remedy provided by the Workers’ Compensation Act
• “when an injury occurs while a worker is being transported to an intended place of employment in a vehicle owned by the employer, the latter’s control over that situation makes the vehicle an extension of the work place”
• “when an injury occurs while a worker is being transported to an intended place of employment in a vehicle owned by the employer, the latter’s control over that situation makes the vehicle an extension of the work place”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).