Johnson v. Eugene Emergency Physicians, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding order of dismissal for reconsideration despite record evidence of sanctioned party’s “egregious and willful in the extreme” violative conduct because the trial court did not consider less severe sanctions
• “keeping in mind that dismissal defeats a litigant’s right to redress grievances in a court,” sanction of dismissal for discovery violation was not sufficiently justified where court did not explain why less onerous sanction would not be just
• accepting, for purposes of deciding the case, the parties’ agreement that “the standards applicable to a sanction for a discovery violation under ORCP 46 B(2) are also applicable to ORCP 54 B(1)”; ORCP 46 B(2
• \review of the court's ruling under ORCP 54 B is for abuse of discretion\
• vacating and remanding for reconsideration under similar circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).