Skip to main content
· 12/11/2009

Johnson v. Estate of Brazill

Citations

  • 917 N.E.2d 1235
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 2587
  • 2009 WL 4730824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that an order denying a motion to clarify and simply affirming the trial court’s previous ruling created a new, appealable order
  • the filing of a motion to reconsider does not toll the time period within which an appeal can be filed
  • each addressing belated interlocutory appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Darden, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.