Johnson v. Dretke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the first Ernst factor disfavored application of sovereign immunity because “there is no indication that the state contributes to the fund” earmarked for funding entity
• holding that the first Ernst factor disfavored application of sovereign immunity because “there is no indication that the state contributes to the fund” earmarked for funding entity
• “once the district court dismisse[s] the core federal claims from the case, it [1s] appropriate for it to dismiss, without prejudice, the state claims, so that the plaintiffs may pursue these claims in a more appropriate forum’’
• not finding Eleventh Amendment immunity when “any debt of the cotton growers’ organization ‘shall not constitute a debt of the state or any department, agency, political subdivision, official, or employee of the state.’” (citing to the relevant statute)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).