Johnson v. Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a confidentiality provision in a redemption agreement between a defendant and a third party “may have been sufficient to justify the protective order, [but] it is insufficient to justify filing documents on the court’s docket under seal”
• “Expert testimony as to intent, motive, or state of mind offers no more than the drawing of an inference from the facts of the case,” which is “within the competence of the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).