Skip to main content
· 2/18/2010

Johnson v. DIVERSICARE AFTON OAKS, LLC

Citations

  • 597 F.3d 673
  • 2010 WL 537756

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a motion to reconsider based on newly discovered evidence should only be granted if “(1) the facts discovered are of such a nature that they would probably change the outcome; (2
  • only evidence that “[is] actually newly discovered and could not have been discovered earlier by proper diligence” warrants reconsideration
  • the Court can only consider evidence that “is newly discovered and could not have been discovered earlier by proper diligence” during a motion for reconsideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Garza, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.