· 2/18/2010
Johnson v. DIVERSICARE AFTON OAKS, LLC
Citations
- 597 F.3d 673
- 2010 WL 537756
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a motion to reconsider based on newly discovered evidence should only be granted if “(1) the facts discovered are of such a nature that they would probably change the outcome; (2
- only evidence that “[is] actually newly discovered and could not have been discovered earlier by proper diligence” warrants reconsideration
- the Court can only consider evidence that “is newly discovered and could not have been discovered earlier by proper diligence” during a motion for reconsideration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Garza, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.