· 9/19/1961
Johnson v. Danielson
Citations
- 295 F.2d 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “if in fact the order here is an order for continuance under supervision *** then the State’s assertion of unappealability is correct”
- “if in fact the order here is an order for continuance under supervision *** as it so states on its face, then the State’s assertion of unappealability is correct”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamley, Merrill, Orr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.