Skip to main content
· 9/19/1961

Johnson v. Danielson

Citations

  • 295 F.2d 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “if in fact the order here is an order for continuance under supervision *** then the State’s assertion of unappealability is correct”
  • “if in fact the order here is an order for continuance under supervision *** as it so states on its face, then the State’s assertion of unappealability is correct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamley, Merrill, Orr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.