Skip to main content
· 6/1/2011

Johnson v. Cypress Hill

Citations

  • 641 F.3d 867
  • 98 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1842
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10939
  • 2011 WL 2138085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the prejudice that would result from amendment “well after the close of discovery and on the eve of summary judgment proceedings”
  • stating the circumstances under which a district court may exercise its discretion to deny leave to amend under Rule 15(a)
  • denying motion for leave to file second amended complaint after filing of motion for summary judgment
  • affirming a district court’s denial of leave to file an amended complaint after four years of litigation
  • listing reasons for which a district court may deny leave to amend
  • no abuse discretion in denying leave to amend complaint after discovery closed and substantive motions were filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manion, Evans, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.