Johnson v. County of Nassau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff was not similarly situated to the other employees where he “failed to offer competent evidence from which any reasonable trier of fact could infer that any of the three individuals . . . had substantially similar job responsibilities”
• “Government officials sued in their official capacities are generally considered to be in privity with the government entity that they serve.”
• “In order for the remarks to be deemed significant, the plaintiff must show their nexus to the adverse employment decision.”
• “Because the adverse actions allegedly began to occur within weeks of this meeting, the Court finds that a rational factfinder could infer a causal connection between the alleged adverse actions suffered by Plaintiff and the protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).