Johnson v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the unexplained exclusive possession of part of the stolen property warrants inference that thief stole all of it
• both holding that proof of the defendant’s possession of two tires of a set of four stolen tires demonstrates he had taken the other two

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1948-11-22· cited 33×
• Henderson v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-04-28· cited 32×
• Pauley v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1928-09-20· cited 17×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hill v. State
  Texas Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 40×
• Kelley v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1924-11-13· cited 24×
• People v. Fagan
  California Supreme Court· 1885-03-21· cited 9×