Johnson v. City of Winter Haven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that ambiguities must be interpreted against the party drawing the contract if the circumstances surrounding the contract do not make the terms clear
• indicating that ambiguities must be interpreted against the party drawing the contract if the circumstances surrounding the contract do not make the terms clear
• finding clause ambiguous because “intent of the ‘pollution exclusion’ clause was to eliminate coverage for damages arising out of pollution ... by industry-related activities”
• pollution exclusion clause held ambiguous and meant to cover only industrial pollution and contamination
• sand and dirt washing into lake

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).