Johnson v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• looking to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 94 S.Ct. 2140, 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974), to aid in our interpretation of Md. Rule 209
• “Although in some circumstances the class action may be an important public interest device, in others it contravenes the more traditional notions of an individual’s jurisprudential rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).